May 8, 2008 7:11 PM
April/May Question for the Profession: Are baby strollers really welcome at inservice?
It's a new phenomenon, one that has only begun recently. When you look around at professional meetings you see baby strollers. While someone is presenting a riveting lecture on deductive reasoning or standards-based delivery of instruction, you often hear a faint cry or laugh filter from the cotton and plastic walls. A few eyes will look sideways, some teachers smile while others frown. The speaker sometimes gets bent out of shape, or if they're a parent, they might go pick up the little one and carry him/her around while they talk.
One of the articles in this month's Making a Difference issue is titled "Balancing a Full House and a Full Classroom." The teachers speaking in the article describe how our profession is so great for raising a family. Is that really true or are we kidding ourselves? I remember the first time a female teacher dared to bring her infant to our summer conference. I listened to the various comments by others, "I can't believe she'd bring a baby that small," "Couldn't she find a sitter," and "I bet it starts screaming as soon as the meeting starts." These comments were from men and women alike. That was nearly 10 years ago. If the teachers in the article believe that we're so open to making teaching agriculture a family affair, why were those comments made?
I would speculate that times have changed. Professional meetings used to be defined as events where spouses and children were left at home so the (male) educator could focus on developing their skills. It was an opportunity to "socialize" after the meetings were over as well. It could almost be deemed a "good ol' boys, she-woman-haters" club meeting if you will (I throw that one in hoping others remember Alfalfa's club on the Little Rascels show). Then, one day, women started showing up at inservice activities. Suddenly there were teachers who couldn't bare to leave their family behind for a week of meetings and carousing. And why should they? What is going on at a summer conference conducted by and for agricultural educators that would make it so sacred that they couldn't bring their kids? I'm proud to say that not only are those strollers showing up at inservice with female teachers pushing them, but the male teachers are bringing their children with them as well.
So, why even ask the question? Because, I still observe the frowns from some teachers when they see the kids in tow. Because, I still hear the comments under their breath about how this is supposed to be a professional meeting not a vacation. We talk about keeping the teachers we have in the classroom if our profession is going to survive and we've got a whole generation that believe teaching is a career not a lifestyle. If we want to keep them teaching, we've got to let them truly focus on family and get some work in on the side.
So I ask, is agricultural education really a family-friendly profession? Are baby strollers welcome at inservice? I hope that at least one of my comments has either offended or inspired you enough to share your comments and thoughts. Do you believe families are a welcomed diversion or an intrusion in professional development? Is the smile that babies and children bring to our faces overshadowed by their interruptions in meetings?
One of the articles in this month's Making a Difference issue is titled "Balancing a Full House and a Full Classroom." The teachers speaking in the article describe how our profession is so great for raising a family. Is that really true or are we kidding ourselves? I remember the first time a female teacher dared to bring her infant to our summer conference. I listened to the various comments by others, "I can't believe she'd bring a baby that small," "Couldn't she find a sitter," and "I bet it starts screaming as soon as the meeting starts." These comments were from men and women alike. That was nearly 10 years ago. If the teachers in the article believe that we're so open to making teaching agriculture a family affair, why were those comments made?
I would speculate that times have changed. Professional meetings used to be defined as events where spouses and children were left at home so the (male) educator could focus on developing their skills. It was an opportunity to "socialize" after the meetings were over as well. It could almost be deemed a "good ol' boys, she-woman-haters" club meeting if you will (I throw that one in hoping others remember Alfalfa's club on the Little Rascels show). Then, one day, women started showing up at inservice activities. Suddenly there were teachers who couldn't bare to leave their family behind for a week of meetings and carousing. And why should they? What is going on at a summer conference conducted by and for agricultural educators that would make it so sacred that they couldn't bring their kids? I'm proud to say that not only are those strollers showing up at inservice with female teachers pushing them, but the male teachers are bringing their children with them as well.
So, why even ask the question? Because, I still observe the frowns from some teachers when they see the kids in tow. Because, I still hear the comments under their breath about how this is supposed to be a professional meeting not a vacation. We talk about keeping the teachers we have in the classroom if our profession is going to survive and we've got a whole generation that believe teaching is a career not a lifestyle. If we want to keep them teaching, we've got to let them truly focus on family and get some work in on the side.
So I ask, is agricultural education really a family-friendly profession? Are baby strollers welcome at inservice? I hope that at least one of my comments has either offended or inspired you enough to share your comments and thoughts. Do you believe families are a welcomed diversion or an intrusion in professional development? Is the smile that babies and children bring to our faces overshadowed by their interruptions in meetings?
